By Paulo
Mendes Pinto*
Throughout our History there
were several moments when we were forced to take sides, to choose a position,
when circumstances forced us to do so. While regarding the high value of
stability, times of crisis and radicalization can lead us to a clarification of
positions and to a civic positioning for the common good.
A few months ago I attended
the main Friday Islamic prayer at a quasi makeshift mosque, in a poor space,
deprived of any wealth, free from any ostentation. What was significant, in
what was happening in that ordinary backstreet of Amadora, was simply the fact
that hundreds of believers, mostly of Guinean origin, were gathering to declare
before themselves and God, that they are part of a community who feels Islamic,
according to the original meaning of the word: believing and submitting to God.
It was such a rich
experience, almost unspeakable. I expected the reception to be friendly, and it
was. I expected to receive the regular greetings, and I did receive them. But
what really amazed me, what struck me most emotionally, was the sense of
humanity I found there.
I was confronted a number of
times with the statement (from the leaders of the community, to the Imam,
passing through a large number of believers): "We are all brothers. In
creation there were no religions. We are all equal. Religions came later. We
are all brothers.” Some of the Muslims who told me this hardly spoke
Portuguese, but they knew this theological and philosophical message and had it
internalized: we are all equal before a Divine Creation. What a lesson of
humanity I received among this small Islamic community!
Today many Muslims, with a
strong desire not to be confused with
alleged-Countries-even-more-alleged-Islamic, express loud and clear their idea
of Islam referring to the essential, the creative moment in which all Men are
Brothers in a genisiac fraternity.
This has been, in fact, one
of the great breaches in the immense theological currents of monotheisms: how
to combine a certain spirit of "election" or "choice",
inherent to believers and practicing believers, with the inevitability of all
being "creatures of God" through the creative act.
This is the right time to
declare the separation between those who kill, or simply ban the infidels, and
those who bear the disturbing difference and say that, after all, we are all
equal, considering the primeval moment. If the sense of belonging and
community leads us often to exclusion and exclusiveness, the notion of common
origin - which in no way negates the previous notion -, brings us to inclusion,
tolerance or even to communion.
Theologically and
anthropologically, this stance is the basis, not for dialogue, but for
coexistence. More than desiring idyllically that we will dialogue with each
other, what interests us today is that we wil surpass the death barbaric
baseline.
In the commonplace of civil
institutions, we are all citizens and we are all entitled to the same human
rights. How pragmatic it would be if from the evangelical Christian
fundamentalists to the Jewish ultra-Orthodox, passing , of course, through the
Islamic fundamentalists, all were able to take on what their Holy Texts say in
such a crystalline way: in Creation there were no believers or infidels!
Once the omnipotence of God
places Him so much above what is utterable that we represent Him as Creator of
everything, including Time, only the smallness in each of us, limited in
everything, especially in time, leads us to say that some are more children of
creation than others. This idea of Humanity is, above all, the Ecology of the
Human and of the planet, itself, of the Common House to which we are
irrevocably linked.
Only then can we follow up
Luther King’s idea: either we learn to live as brothers, or we perish as
... as what we have been over the centuries! That’s what we have done more: to
kill in the name of God.
*Science of Religions Programme Director at
Lusófona University – Lisbon – Portugal
REFERÊNCIA:
PINTO, Paulo Mendes. Children of a Greater God, or For a Religious Ecology. Disponível
em: <https://parliamentofreligions.org/blog/2017-02-15-1254/children-greater-god-or-religious-ecology>.
Acesso em: 18 fev. 2017.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário